International Meeting for Autism Research (London, May 15-17, 2008): Lack of Local Bias during Selective Attention Global-Local Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorders
Start | Browse by Day or Format | Author Index

Lack of Local Bias during Selective Attention Global-Local Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Thursday, May 15, 2008: 11:45 AM
Mancy (Novotel London West)
S. A. Johnson , Departments of Psychology, Pediatrics, & Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
L. M. Blaha , Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
R. R. Murphy , Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
J. T. Townsend , Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
V. A. Bruce , Department of Psychology, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
J. C. Stout , School of Psychology, Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Background: Previous studies of global-local (GL) processing in autism spectrum disorders (ASD; Rinehart et al., 2000; Plaisted et al., 1999) suggest a lack of both global advantage and global interference. However, their methods differed fundamentally (including unlimited stimulus presentation time, lack of spatial uncertainty, few trials) from traditional designs of GL studies. Studies of controls have indicated that such changes in GL task parameters significantly alter performance (Kimchi, 1992).

Objectives: In the current study, we characterized GL processing in ASD during selective attention tasks using traditional cognitive science methods.

Methods: Sixteen high-functioning individuals with an ASD and 16 age- and IQ-matched comparison subjects completed eight selective attention GL tasks. Four tasks used hierarchical letter stimuli and four used number stimuli. For each type of stimulus, we employed two methodologies: 1) replication of methods used in previous ASD GL studies, but with a greater number of trials and 2) methods consistent with traditional designs of GL studies, incorporating brief presentation times, spatial uncertainty, and backward masking.

Results: Repeated measures ANOVAs revealed main effects for attended dimension with faster response times for the global versus local dimension for both groups on all tasks. Contrary to findings from previous ASD studies, global interference effects were demonstrated by both groups for both replication and traditional GL tasks, and neither group demonstrated local interference. Analyses at the individual level indicated that few participants responded faster when attending to local versus global information. When present, this atypical result occurred at the same rate in both groups. Similarly, only a few control and ASD participants showed local interference.

Conclusions: We found typical GL processing in high-functioning ASD participants. Both control and ASD groups demonstrated global advantage, global interference, and lack of local interference. Findings are discussed in light of cognitive theories of ASD and methodological considerations.

See more of: Cognition 1
See more of: Oral Presentations
See more of: Oral Presentations