19337
Social but Not Repetitive Scores on the Quantitative Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (Q-CHAT) Predict Later Autism Spectrum Diagnosis in a Prospective High-Risk Sibling Study

Friday, May 15, 2015: 3:16 PM
Grand Ballroom B (Grand America Hotel)
G. Pasco1, C. Allison2, S. Baron-Cohen3, M. H. Johnson4 and T. Charman1, (1)Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, (2)Autism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, (3)Autism Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, (4)Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom
Background: The British Autism Study of Infant Siblings (BASIS) is a prospective study of children with older siblings with ASD (High-Risk sibs: HR) and controls with older siblings who are developing typically (Low-Risk sibs: LR). Participants are assessed at various time points from approximately 5 months until 36 months of age. The Q-CHAT is a 25-item parent questionnaire, designed to be an early screening instrument for autism. Each item has a 5-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from 0 to 4. Higher scores relate to higher levels of autism symptomatology.

Objectives: To investigate the factor structure of the Q-CHAT in a sample of 24-month-olds participating in a prospective study of children at risk for ASD, and to determine which factors, if any, are predictive of outcome, and at what ages.

Methods: The Q-CHAT was completed by parents when their children were 14-, 24- and 36-months of age. Following the 36-month visit a best estimate research diagnosis was applied to HR sibs. Outcome categories are: Typically developing (HR-TD); ASD (HR-ASD) and Atypical (HR-ATYP). The latter group consists of children not meeting criteria for ASD but meeting ASD criteria on the ADOS, ADI-R or being below 1.5 SD on the Mullen. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was conducted on the 24-month Q-CHAT scores.

Results: Q-CHAT scores were available for 218 children. PCA suggested a two-factor solution. Factor A, Social Communication (SC), has 8 items, and Factor B, Stereotyped and Repetitive Behaviours (SRB), 9 items. Outcomes were known for 182 children: LR (N=69); HR-TD (N=67); HR-ATYP (N=22); HR-ASD (N=24). At 14 months SC scores predicted ASD outcome (t=3.61, p<.001) but the SRB factor did not (t=-1.42, p=.17). In fact, the LR scores for SRB were significantly higher than for the combined HR group scores (t=-2.76, p=.007). At 14 months the two factors were not significantly correlated (r=.02, p=.79). At 24 months SC was significantly higher in the HR-ASD group than the combined non-ASD groups (t=4.23, p<.001), but differences were not significant for SRB (t=1.96, p=.06). SRB scores for LR and HR groups did not differ significantly. At 36 months both factors were significantly higher in the ASD group than in the non-ASD groups (SC: t=4.18, p<.001; SRB: t=3.27, p=.003).

Conclusions: Findings suggest that differences in parent-reported social communication skills in children during their second and third years may be predictive of later autism diagnostic status. For stereotyped and repetitive behaviours, however, there seems to be a more dynamic situation, with differences in early ratings not predicting outcome but by 36 months scores differed in the expected pattern. This shift appears to be due to a combination of two issues: children who are on their way to developing autism may show more stereotyped and repetitive behaviours over time; and parents with no direct experience of autism may rate their young children as having more repetitive behaviours relative to parents of children with older siblings with autism.