Whilst clinical evidence in support of the hypothesis has been reported, population-based studies have found no effect of MMR exposure on either onset or population frequency of the outcomes investigated. Such studies are cited as providing evidence of ‘no association’ between MMR, IBD and autism spectrum disorder and as refuting the
Objectives:
to examine the extent to which studies have been designed appropriately and with reference to the original Wakefield hypothesis and to examine the extent to which claims of its having been refuted or supported are valid
Methods:
A systematic review of published and publicly available reports pertinent to the hypothesis. Further discussion and evaluation is undertaken of those studies whose design allows examination of the hypothesis. Details are provided regarding design features that mitigated against inclusion of rejected studies
Results:
355 studies were identified. 297 were rejected and 58 underwent additional evaluation. Five were identified as meeting criteria for further evaluation.
Conclusions:
Few studies claiming to test the Wakefield hypothesis have successfully addressed it. No study meeting criteria was able to unequivocally demonstrate a causal role for the MMR vaccine in ASDs, four studies provided some support in favour of specific aspects.