Objectives: Determine whether there are deficits in IJA with anticipatory smiling, reactive smiling, or IJA with no smiling in infant siblings of children with an ASD (high-risk siblings) compared with infant siblings of typically developing children (low-risk siblings).
Methods: High-risk (n = 56) and low-risk (n = 26) infant siblings were administered the Early Social Communication Scales (ESCS) at 8, 10, and 12 months of age. During the ESCS, IJA episodes (in which the infant gazes at the social partner to share information about an event or object) were coded for smiling behavior. IJA was coded as involving an anticipatory smile (gaze at object, smile, turn while smiling to gaze at examiner), reactive smile (gaze at object, gaze to examiner, then smile), or no smile (no smile during gaze to examiner).
Results: Hierarchical linear modeling was used to examine group differences based on high-risk status in the development of frequency of IJA with anticipatory smiling, reactive smiling, and no smiling. The best fit model for IJA with anticipatory smiles included risk group status as a predictor at the intercept, χ2 = 6.19, p = 0.01. High-risk siblings produced fewer IJA with anticipatory smiles than low-risk siblings (β01 = -1.88, t(79) = -2.58, p = 0.01). Linear (β10 = 5.54, t(80) = 4.39, p < 0.001) and quadratic (β20 = -2.34, t(80) = -3.97, p < 0.001) coefficients did not differ by status. There was no significant effect of risk group status on IJA with reactive smiling or IJA with no smiling.
Conclusions: High-risk siblings produced fewer IJA with anticipatory smiling between 8 and 12 months than low-risk siblings, indicating that communicating positive affect may be a specific impairment in children at risk for developing an ASD. We are currently investigating whether this apparent impairment predicts later diagnostic and social outcomes.
See more of: Cognition and Behavior
See more of: Symptoms, Diagnosis & Phenotype