Objectives: The current study examined if such subgroups exist and whether their overlap or distinctiveness in associated comorbid symptoms and cognitive profiles gave support for a gradient overarching disorder hypothesis or a separate disorders hypothesis.
Methods: Latent class analysis (LCA) was performed on Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) and Conners’ Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R:L) data of 644 children (5 to 17 years of age). Classes were compared for comorbid symptoms and cognitive profiles of motor speed and variability, executive functioning, attention, emotion recognition and detail-focused processing style.
Results: LCA revealed five classes: two without behavioral problems, one with only ADHD-behavior, and two with both clinical symptom levels of ASD and ADHD, but with one domain more prominent than the other ((ADHD(+ASD) and ASD(+ADHD)). In accordance with the gradient overarching disorder hypothesis were the presence of an ADHD class without ASD symptoms, and the absence of an ASD class without ADHD symptoms, as well as cognitive functioning of the simple ADHD-class being less impaired than that of both comorbid classes. In conflict with this hypothesis was that there was some specificity of cognitive deficits across classes.
Conclusions: The overlapping cognitive deficits may be used to further unravel the shared etiological underpinnings of ASD and ADHD, while the non-overlapping deficits may indicate why some children develop ADHD despite their enhanced risk for ASD. The two subtypes of children with both ASD and ADHD behavior will most likely benefit from different clinical approaches.