Objectives: This study examined future thinking skills in CWAs, using two types of future thinking tasks that we termed self-based and mechanical-based. We argue that self-based tasks require a projection of the self into the future to pre-experience an event, whereas mechanical-based tasks require reasoning about future physical transformations. We predicted that CWAs would perform better on mechanical-based tasks than on self-based tasks, since the latter rely heavily on a concept of a future self, and hence on theory of mind skills, which are frequently impaired in CWAs.
Methods: Fourteen children, diagnosed with Autistic Disorder, Asperger’s Syndrome, or Pervasive Developmental Disorder-Not Otherwise Specified by independent clinicians, completed 10 tasks; 5 of each of the two types described above. They also completed the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 3rd edition (Dunn & Dunn, 1997).
Results: CWAs passed significantly more of the mechanical tasks (M = 2.07) than the self tasks (1.14), z = -2.59, p = .01.
Conclusions: Although the results must be considered preliminary due to the small sample size, this study is an important addition to the body of autism literature which, to date, has not targeted future thinking skills. Our next step is to examine future thinking skills in a larger, more representative, sample of children with Autism Spectrum Disorders.